Amazing-Mirror/fragattacks
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/vanhoefm/fragattacks.git synced 2024-11-28 18:28:23 -05:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fragattack: new testcase in README

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Mathy Vanhoef 2020-12-10 05:12:51 +04:00
parent c79a53420a
commit fc1d0aaefd
1 changed files with 5 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
research/README.md
View File

@ -538,6 +538,7 @@ All commands work against both clients and APs unless noted otherwise.
| `ping I,E,F,AE --rekey-plain` | If the device performs the rekey handshake in plaintext.
| `ping I,E,F,AE --rekey-plain --rekey-req` | Same as above, and actively request a rekey as client.
| `ping I,E,F,AE --rekey-early-install` | Install the new key after sending message 3 of the 4-way handshake.
| `ping I,E,F,E [--rekey-pl] [--rekey-req]` | Same as above 4 tests, but with longer delay before 2nd fragment.
| `ping I,F,BE,AE --freebsd` | Mixed key attack against FreeBSD or similar implementations.
| <div align="center">*[Cache attacks (§5)](#id-extended-cache)*</div>
| `ping I,E,R,AE --freebsd [--full-reconnect]` | Cache attack specific to FreeBSD implementations.
@ -599,6 +600,10 @@ these alternative mixed key attack tests. Some remarks:
a pairwise session rekey. To reliably test these clients, add the `--rekey-early-install` parameter. This test
is not meaningfull against APs.
- `ping I,E,F,E [--rekey-pl] [--rekey-req]`: This test variant is the same as the above four, except that the second
fragment is send 1 second after the 4-way handshake. This can be important because in a low number of devices there
is a small delay the new key is installed. Note that `--rekey-pl` is a shorthand of `--rekey-plain`.
Finally, in case the test `ping-frag-sep` doesn't succeed, you should try the following mixed key attack test:
- `ping I,F,BE,AE --freebsd`: This essentially performs the rekey handshake against a FreeBSD implementation, or